![]() ![]() ![]() He explained that if the amendment is adopted “the entire structure that governs USDA’s National Organic Program would be weakened, ultimately causing severe economic harm to tens of thousands of organic producers and businesses across the country, and irrefutably shaking the confidence of consumers in the USDA Organic label.” “Organic producers and anyone who values organic needs to realized that this is about a whole lot more than animal welfare,” he said in a statement released yesterday. The latest affront to the OLPS rule threatens more than just an update to the animal welfare standards under the organic certification – it also threatens the overall “future of organic,” according to OTA CEO Tom Chapman. Amendment threatens more than animal welfare In response to the still ongoing lawsuit and an outpouring of public support for updating organic animal welfare standards, the USDA under the current administration published the current proposed OLPS rule. The trade group claimed the Trump Administration’s freeze never should have applied to the rule because it was finalized before the administration came into office. In response, the Organic Trade Association sued USDA in the fall of 2017 for repeatedly and allegedly illegally delaying and threatening to potentially suspend the rule potentially indefinitely. But before the industry could celebrate its hard-won victory, the Trump Administration froze the passage on the grounds that the sweeping changes exceeded the statutory authority of the National Organic Program. The threat posed to the proposed OLPS rule by Self follows similar Republican lead actions in recent years that have dogged the organic industry’s efforts to update its animal welfare standards.Īn earlier, final version of the OLPS regulations were passed in the 11 th hour of the Obama Administration after nearly 15 years of negotiation by organic stakeholders, industry and government. ![]() The goal of the proposed OLPS rule is to “promote a fairer and more competitive market for organic livestock producers, by making sure that certified USDA livestock products are produced to the same consistent standard,” according to the US Department of Agriculture. ![]() The OLPS proposed rule, if finalized, would standardize livestock health care practices, including physical alteration procedures that are prohibited and restricted for organic livestock living conditions “to better reflect the needs and behaviors of the different species, as well as related consumer expectations ” and transport of animals, including new requirements on the transport o organic livestock for sale or slaughter, according to the Federal Register notice published last summer. Keith Self, R-Texas, the amendment if passed, would prohibit the use of funds to “write, prepare, or publish any final or interim final rule relating to, or otherwise implement of enforce, the proposed rule entitled ‘National Organic Program Organic Livestock and Poultry Standards’ published in the Federal Register on Aug. Emulsifiers, stabilizers, hydrocolloids.Chocolate and confectionery ingredients.Carbohydrates and fibers (sugar, starches).Plant-based, alt proteins, precision fermentation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |